The Paris church of Saint Sulpice has played a role in the Mystery of Rennes-le-Château ever since Gérard de Sède made mention of it in his book l’Or de Rennes also called Le Trésor Maudit in 1967. We now know he was prompted by Pierre Plantard. Les Dossiers Secrets,  deposited in the French National Library between 1964 and 1967 also make mention of St. Sulpice several times. The direct connection with Saunière is that according to De Sède, Saunière visited the Seminary of St. Sulpice in Paris to have the parchments he allegedly discovered in his church deciphered. Its claimed that Bishop Billard sent him there and covered his expenses. At St. Sulpice, it is said, Saunière met Emile Hoffet who indeed deciphered the texts for him.

Although this story is highly controversial and not substantiated by any evidence, the name of St. Sulpice comes back in many of the lines of research. There were strong ties between St. Sulpice, the Compagnie de Saint Sacarament, the Fouquet brothers and Notre Dame de Marceille. Some of Saunière’s best friends like Abbé Eugène Grassaud studied there. Also Louis de Coma studied at St. Sulpice. It features prominently in Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code.

The Great Seminary of Saint Sulpice was founded by Jean-Jacques Olier, a pupil of Saint Vincent de Paul. He lived an exemplary Christian life. Like De Paul, Olier was a member of the legendary Compagnie du Saint Sacrament. Olier did a staggering amount of good works during his life. Central to his ideas was that the Christian Perfection was not only achievable for the clergy but for everybody who is prepared to lead a devout life in piety. Olier was a great organizer. He took his self proclaimed vocation of reviving religious life in France very serious and lived in poverty for many years devoting all the money that came in to making St. Sulpice into the leading national religious institution.

One thing for sure is that St. Sulpice is not your average church. The second largest church in Paris after the slightly larger Notre-Dame, it is dedicated to Saint Sulpitious the Pious. It’s a testament to the works of Olier and De Paul and an impressive signature for the seminary. The current, huge building was erected over a much smaller and older church. It was finished in its current state in 1733 with exception of the façade. The old church itself was built on the ruins of a Roman temple devoted to the Goddess Isis.

In 1737, father Languet de Gercy had a giant sundial installed. Officially only to be able to determine the exact date of Easter. It also stipulated more esoteric notion that the church was built on top of the old Paris Meridian. To represent this, a meridian line of brass was runs across the floor, ascending a white marble obelisk, nearly eleven meters high, at the top of which sits a sphere surmounted by a cross. The contruction was done by the English astronomer Henry Sully. In the south transept window a lens was inserted. At noon on the winter solstice (December 21), the ray of light touches the brass line on the obelisk. At noon on the equinoxes (March 21 and September 21), the ray touches an oval plate of copper in the floor near the altar.

Between 1820 and 1875, the city of Paris asked 17 artists to redecorate the church, the most famous one being Eugène Delacroix. During the decoration some imagery was introduced in the church that is claimed by some researchers to contain clues of an esoteric or masonic nature. It concerns the two stoups, the inversed texts in the signature and Crucifixion mural of Émile Signol and some oddities in two works of Delacroix in the Chapel of the Angels. The works of Delacroix in Saint Sulpice are commonly considered as his spiritual testament, especially ‘Jacob fighting the Angel’.

[Show as slideshow]

from rags to richess

At the end of the 19th century, Bérenger Saunière, the poor parish priest of Rennes-le-Château, all of a sudden started spending a lot more money then he could ever have earned performing his normal duties. He had been assigned to this tiny village in the south of France at the age of 33 and had spent his first few years there in piety and poverty. According to his meticulously kept accounting books, in February 1892 he had a debt of 105 francs and 80,65 francs in his ‘fonds secrets’ (savings). That all changed in the 1890’s. From that time on, his surviving papers and accounts record a total expenditure of some 660.000 francs, equivalent to EUR 2.500.000 today. He would spend up to 50.000 francs in one month in some periods. His salary as a priest was 900 francs per annum. Towards the end of his life he seems to have had some difficulty paying his bills but weeks before his death he appears to have been making plans once again. Saunière’s financial difficulties coincide largely with the World War I, an indication he couldn’t reach his funds abroad?

It’s often said Saunière got his fortune by mass trafficking: receiving money for masses he never said. There’s clear evidence that he was guilty of this practice, like so many of his colleagues at the time. However, the amounts of money he spent are in no relation to his illegal income from that. Detailed analysis of his records has taught he received 110.000 requests to say mass, which is a lot more than he ever could have said when you think a priest could say 3 masses in one day (and didn’t hold sermons every day of course). The going rate for a mass was 1 franc around 1880, increasing up to 1,5 francs at the time of his death. From this he could have earned no more than some 150.000 francs which only accounts for less than a quarter of his recorded spenditure (which was only part of what he really spent). Saunière’s income is further dissected in this article.

the silent witness

It has now been established as more than probable that Bérenger Saunière made one or more discoveries during his life that brought him fortune in one way or another. On top of that he showed some pretty strange behavior throughout his time in Rennes-le-Château, always assisted by his housekeeper Marie Dénarnaud who was 16 years his younger. For years they were seen digging in the cemetery at night together, to such extent that the municipal council filed an official complaint for deplacing graves and disturbing the death after which they did indeed cease there nightly violations of the graveyard. From 1910 onwards, Saunière was under investigation by the diocese of Carcasonne for excessive spending and failing to produce evidence of the source of his fortune other than the claim that the money was given to him as gifts and that he had only spent 193.000 francs. When he kept refusing to share his secrets with the bishop he was sentenced for trafficking masses and forbidden to perform his sacerdotal duties any longer. Marie Dénarnaud, lived on for another 36 years after her master’s death. She promised Noel Corbu, to whom she sold the estate in 1946, to tell him a secret on her deathbed that would make him both powerful and rich. To Corbu’s intense frustration, Dénarnaud had a fit some weeks before she died, leaving her unable to speak or write. She took the secret to her grave. The only thing she had ever said was that ‘the people of Rennes-le-Château walk on gold, without knowing it’.

birth of a mystery

Noel Corbu is probably responsible for what the mystery is today. In need of something to attract visitors to his Hotel du Tour (the refurbished Villa Bethania) he started telling the treasure story to his customers, when he failed to find it on the domain himself. It worked like a magnet, in fact he got so busy telling the story that he later recorded it on tape for his customers. He probably enhanced the story somwhat in his enthusiasm. He attracted the attention of local newspaper Le Depeche du Midi resulting in three full page articles in January 1956 about Saunière, the billionaire priest who had found the treasure of Blanche of Castille. There is no evidence whatsoever that queen Blanche indeed left a treasure in the area that Saunière could have discovered. Some 10 years later, the story was published in book form by French journalist Gérard de Sède: Accursed Treasure of Rennes-le-Château.

De Sède’s book marked the start of a misinformation campaign by French adventurer Pierre Plantard and his friend the Belgian Marquis and actor Phillippe de Chérisey. Allegedly, De Sède published a manuscript by Plantard that he edited. In the next couple of years Plantard and De Chérisey used original Saunière material and home made forged documents to construct a story around the mystery of Abbé Saunière by which they meant to “prove” that Plantard was actually a descendent of the Merovingian bloodline and thus a rightful heir to the French throne. To this end they deposited a series of forged documents in the French National Library: Les Dossiers Secrets. The misfinformation campaign got completely out of hand when BBC scenario writer Henry Lincoln got on the trail and, with the help of Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, drew a conclusion that was a million miles away from what Plantard and the Chérisey had intended: not only was Plantard of Merovingian blood; according to Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, the Merovingians were direct descendents of the offspring of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene.

Today it is almost impossible to distinguish the truth from fantasy. However, most of the leading theories are losely based on facts and legends of the area that can be traced or demonstrated. The half truth is the most difficult to dissect.

the mystery’s historical roots

In the spring of 1645, a shepherd called Ignace Paris found an unknow quantity of golden coins on the lands of Blaise d’Hautpoul, who’s territory included Rennes. Blaise was an ancestor of François d’Hautpoul-Rennes, whose wife Marie de Nègre is believed to be at the origin of the mystery of Rennes-le-Château. Local legend says Paris was killed after refusing to tell where he had found the coins. What followed was a long fight between the Jansenist bishop of Alet Nicolas Pavillon, Blaise d’Hautpoul and the brothers Nicolas and François Fouquet. Nicolas was Louis XIV’s treasurer, François became the bishop of Alet’s neighbour Narbonne in 1659, three years after his brother Nicolas Fouquet wrote a letter to Nicolas, describing a meeting with Poussin in Rome:

He and I discussed certain things, which I shall with ease be able to explan to you in detail - things that will give you, through Monsieur Poussin, advantages which even kings would have great pains to draw from him, and which, according to him, it is possible that nobody else will ever be able to rediscover in the centuries to come. And, what is more, these are things so difficult to discover that nothing now on this earth can prove of better fortune nor be their equal.

In September 1661, Jean Loret, who ran a magazine called ‘La Muze Historique’, wrote of a treasure found in the diocese of Alet(-les-Bains), roughly in the same area. Loret worked for the Fouquets and the Duchess of Longueville who maintained an extensive mail relation with Pavillon. The spiderweb stretches wider still. In 1666, Colbert, who had succeeded Nicolas Fouquet as French minister of Finance, founded the ‘Compagnie Royale des Mines et Fonderies du Languedoc’ with the intend to start mining on Blaise d’Hautpoul’s land (much the same like Bertrand de Blanchefort allegedly asked the Knights Templar to start mining the same lands near the Château de Blanchefort in 1130). In return Blaise was formally granted a status ‘de ne dépendre que du roi’: he was now only answerable to the King alone. You can read more about this in Franck Daffos’ excellent (French) book le Secret Dérobé or on the website he runs with colleague researcher Jean-Pierre Garcia: Rennes-le-Château Archive.

There must have been something interesting enough in this region to attract the attention of so many rich and powerful people. The link with Poussin comes full circle with Louis XIV acquiring his famous painting the Shepherds of Arcadia in 1685 from C.A. Herault, a well known arts dealer at the time. The painting adorned the king’s private chambers until his death.

What Bérenger Saunière appears to have found

There are numerous theories and ideas as to what Saunière found. Several instances have been recorded in which Saunière made reference to something like a treasure. For example Antoine Beaux, Abbé of Campagne-sur-Aude was attending a dinner party at Saunière’s table once. He remarked “My friend, to see you doing so well, one would think you found a treasure”. To this the host appears to have answered: “Me l’an donat, l’ai panat, l’ai parat é bé lo teni“. It’s Saunière’s dialect of the Langue d’Oc. In modern French it means “Ils me l’ont donné, je l’ai pris, je l’ai apprêtré; eh bien, je le tiens bien.” An English translation would be: “They gave it to me, I took it, I made it work and I will hold onto it.”
According to Antoine Captier, the grandson of Saunière’s bellringer of the same name, a glass vial was found by his grandfather inside a wooden baluster in the 1880s. This wooden support pillar that carried the old pulpit, had been taken down during the work to restore the church. When Captier did his round through the church one evening, he noticed part of the baluster had come loose, revealing a small hidden compartment. Inside he found a small glass tube with a document inside. He gave it to Saunière, who started his digging activities in the graveyard soon afterwards. Several local sources have confirmed this story as documented in Captier’s book and the book of Pierre Jarnac. Captier and Jarnac are generally regarded as the most serious researchers that are closest to the original sources.

The story that Saunière found documents in the hollow visigothic altar pillar is probably not true. Research reveals that there was no space inside that pillar so it seems unlikely that is true.

A last story is that Saunière found a pot filled with golden coins and a golden chalice during the renovations. This too apparently happened during the renovation work on the church altar. Saunière immediately sent the workmen off for the rest of the day. When he was asked what it was they found he replied that it was nothing but a collection of worthless religious medals. The Abbé did give a golden chalice from the time of Bigou to his friend Eugène Grassaud. The chalice still exists. It was donated to the church of Rennes-le-Château by the Order of the Knights of Malta around 1750. As it appears his predeccessor Antoine Bigou stashed it away in the church before he fled to Spain to escape the French Revolution.

From these stories it seems likely that Saunière did indeed find some coins, a chalice and one or more documents. The documents either led him to a secret entrance to the old crypt of the Eglise Madeleine (for example via a fake grave of Marie de Nègre) or to another location where he found something that brought him fortune.

The documents Saunière is believed to have found are often referred to as:

1. A parchment containing the genealogy of King (Saint) Dagobert II from 681 to 1244, when Jean VII married Elsinde de Gisors. The document is dated 14th March 1244 and carries the seal of Blanche of Castille, Queen of France

2. The testament of François-Henri d’Hautpoul, Seigneur de Rennes et Bezu, with attached a genealogy of the Merovingian descendants from 1200 to 1644, where 6 lines of descent are related to Saint Vincent de Paul. This document is dated 23rd November 1644 and is signed by Captier, Notaire at Esperaza

3. The testament of Henri de Hautpoul, dated 24th April 1695, in which five saint are invoked of which Saunière later put statues in his church

4. A double sided parchment, produced by his predecessor Abbé Antoine Bigou, containing on one side a piece of Latin text from the new testaments, compiled from Luke, Matthew and Mark. On the other side it contains the story of Jesus visiting Lazarus in Bethania from the Gospel of John in Latin. The double sided parchment (item 4) contains a number of messages, some of which are easy and other which are extremely hard to decode. In combination with the tombstone of Marie de Nègre d’Ables, (who was buried by Antoine Bigou who also made her tombstone), are said to lead to a treasure. It appears like Abbé Saunière, alone or with the help from experts in Paris, cracked the code and followed the treasure map that resulted. The double-sided parchment was first published in two separate sides (the so called grand and small parchments) by Gérard de Sède in the Accursed Treasure of Rennes-le-Château.

In his book Rennes-le-Château, le puzzle reconstitué (2007), Jarnac and French researcher Franck Daffos build a plausible case that the last mentioned parchments actually existed and where sold off by Noel Corbu.

What kind of Treasure could there have been?

Again, numerous possibilities and stories go around. If you disregard those about UFO’s and extraterrestrial visitors there are a number of options. The area around Rennes-le-Château is drenched in a history of bloodshed and treasure. Visigoths, Templars, Cathars and countless noblemen and clergy occupied the area at different times in history. Since Rennes-le-Château was the focal point for many of their activities it is not unthinkable that some of the treasure that these groups accumulated was left in the region. The accounts that are underpinned with some sort of theory and evidence to at least identify them from pure fantasy are mentioned here. Saunière found:

• the Crypt of the Seigneurs de Rennes beneath his church. If the genealogies are correct, it might even have been the Crypt of one or more Merovingian royals, buried with the artifacts and treasure that was the custom of the time
• a treasure hidden in 12 places as also cryptically concealed into the book ‘Le Vraie Langue Celtique‘ by Saunière’s colleague Abbé Henri Boudet of Rennes-le-Bains
• the treasure of the Visigoths, containing the treasure of the temple of Jerusalem, that roman emperor Titus took from the holy land in 70 a.d. and Alaric I, in his turn took from Rome during the sack of 394
• the treasure of the Cathars. We know that the Crusaders, when they penetrated the last Cathar bastion of Montségur, found nothing of their alleged treasure. We also know that, on the morning of the surrender, three men, on the orders of their chief, were let down from the ramparts by ropes. Were they given the task of taking the treasure somewhere else, or of being the sole survivors who would pass their beliefs on to future generations?
• the treasure of the Templars. they had a powerful presence in the region, with a commandery at Campagne-sur-Aude and an observation post on Mont du Bézu. At Blanchefort there was a castle which belonged to them. There was a certain ‘taboo’ on the Templar possessions, which meant that their hidden treasure has come down through the centuries without anyone being able to get their hands on it. Anything belonging to the Templars has always inspired great fear in those who had to guard it or had reason to approach it
• the treasure of Blanch de Castille. The mother of Saint Louis, regent of France, came to Rédé (Rennes-le-Château) in 1249, heavily guarded and loaded down with innumerable items of baggage. According to the parchment this baggage was buried in an underground passage below the former Château of the Counts of Voisin and then walled in
• evidence that the Merovingian bloodline is unbroken. Allegedly, after the murder of Dagobert II and his family in 679 by orders of Pepin the Fat, a son survived named Sigisbert IV that found refuge in Rhedae (Rennes-le-Château) and became lord of the region. This would mean that the Merovingian bloodline had survived to this day with a legitimate claim to the French throne. In 1791, when Saunière’s predecessors had to flee the revolution to Spain this would indeed have been explosive news
• evidence that Jesus didn’t die on the cross but was in fact married to Mary Magdalene. After the crucifixion that he survived or during which a replacement figure died, Marie Magdalene came to France carrying her offspring that later became the Merovingians or intermarried with them. Saunière would have blackmailed the Vatican with this evidence
• the tombs of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea in the vicinity of Opoul Perillos, as indicated by a miniature model of the Holy Places, he allegedly ordered just before his death and that was never finished
• the tomb of Mary Magdalene and perhaps even one or more of her children in the vicinity of Rennes-le-Château, perhaps in the Grotto locally known as the Grotte du Fournet, Dite de la Magdeleine or Burial Site of Mary Magdalene
• evidence that the Ark of the Covenant or at least its contents survived the ages and is hidden or was hidden below the church of Rennes-le-Château in the old crypt of the Hautpoul-Blancheforts. It was taken there from Notre Dame de Marceille between 1893 and 1902 by its keepers Saunière, Boudet, Gélis and Billard. This hypothesis is a lot less far-fetched than it sounds when you have read the meticulously constructed and carefully researched book ‘The Holy Grail and the Ark of the Covenant‘ by acclaimed Dutch writer Klaas van Urk, in which his brother and he documented their ten-year chase of the Ark’s trail through history. Sadly his book is only available in Dutch for the moment.
• two genealogies from 1244 and 1644 that were bought by the the Vatican after which they kept giving him large amounts of money to continue his search though their aid Henri Boudet. The Vatican hoped Saunière would find the Ark of the Covenant that had been lost for over 600 years.
• money and valuables stashed away by the noble families of the region when they had to flee the country from the revolution

• the mummified body of Christ, Mary Magdalene or both is buried in the region somewhere
• the Arma Christi (the instruments used during the Passion of Christ) were kept in Notre Dame de Marceille and Rennes-le-Château by a group of Fransciscan Ebionites.

©2007-2008 rlcresearch.com, all rights reserved